In No Judicial System Is It Possible To Continually Bring Up Problems That Have Been Resolved: SC
JR Choudhary 
The Supreme Court ruled that it is a "absolute waste of the judicial time" for someone to keep bringing up the same matter after it has been settled at the highest level of the legal system.
The comments were made after the Supreme Court rejected a petition brought by a man who claimed that he had been fired from his job and that the case had been resolved in 2004 at a cost of Rs 10,000.
It mentioned the denial of a review petition in the case.
The petitioner has not filed a curative plea, but rather a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, saying that injustice has been done to him and that the case should be reopened, according to a bench of Justices SK Kaul and Aravind Kumar.
When they believe their basic rights have been violated, people have the option to petition the Supreme Court for justice under Article 32 of the Constitution.
"No judicial system can allow for a situation where someone continues bringing up the same matter after it has been settled at the highest level. In its decision on May 1, the bench said, "This is a total waste of court time.
In light of the petitioner's dismissal, it said, "We hereby dismiss this petition with costs, though we limit the amount of costs."
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) library cost of Rs 10,000 was ordered by the court to be deposited with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Fund.
